2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1969 Volvo 120

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1969 Volvo 120. (106 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1111 kg more than 1969 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (210 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Volvo 120. (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Volvo 120.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Equinox 1969 Volvo 120
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Equinox 120
Year Released 2009 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3349 cc 1986 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 182 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 167 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2141 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 45 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]