2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1973 Honda 1300

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1973 Honda 1300. (81 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1246 kg more than 1973 Honda 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (210 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 1300. (105 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 1300.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Equinox 1973 Honda 1300
Make Chevrolet Honda
Model Equinox 1300
Year Released 2009 1973
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3349 cc 1298 cc
Horse Power 182 HP 81 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 105 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2141 kg 895 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1510 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 35 L