2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 16 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Equinox | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |