2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 444 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Equinox | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |