2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1221 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (210 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Equinox | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3349 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2141 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 57 L |