2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1983 ZIL 4104

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,689 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 ZIL 4104 (311 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1194 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 ZIL 4104 (608 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. (210 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1983 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Equinox 1983 ZIL 4104
Make Chevrolet ZIL
Model Equinox 4104
Year Released 2009 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3349 cc 7689 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 182 HP 311 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 608 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 108 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 105 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Weight 2141 kg 3335 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 5750 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 2090 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 3340 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]