2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1986 Subaru XT

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Subaru XT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Subaru XT would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1986 Subaru XT. (147 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1986 Subaru XT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Subaru XT weights approximately 17 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Subaru XT. (211 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Subaru XT. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1986 Subaru XT has manual transmission. 1986 Subaru XT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Equinox 1986 Subaru XT
Make Chevrolet Subaru
Model Equinox XT
Year Released 2009 1986
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3425 cc 2672 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V boxer
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 147 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 211 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 67 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1261 kg 1278 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]