2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2012 Porsche 911

To start off, 2012 Porsche 911 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Porsche 911 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Porsche 911 (530 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 345 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Porsche 911 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Porsche 911 weights approximately 111 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Porsche 911 (699 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 Porsche 911 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Equinox 2012 Porsche 911
Make Chevrolet Porsche
Model Equinox 911
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type SUV Convertible
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3425 cc 3800 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V boxer
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 530 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 699 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 7-speed automated manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1549 kg 1660 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4478 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.8 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 67 L