2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 61 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda CX-5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-5.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Equinox | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Equinox | CX-5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 56 L |