2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E

To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 356 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E.

Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (370 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. (210 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Equinox 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
Make Chevrolet Mercedes-Benz
Model Equinox E
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type SUV Convertible
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3349 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V boxer
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 182 HP 298 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 370 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 5250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 12.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2141 kg 1785 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4698 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 2015 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1402 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.8 L/100km 7.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 11.3 L/100km