2009 Chevrolet Express vs. 2001 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Express is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet Express has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 2001 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Express will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Express | 2001 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Express | Maloo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
