2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 174 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Triumph 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Triumph 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | HHR | 1800 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2201 cc | 1774 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2550 mm |