2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1952 Ferrari 340 MM
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 340 MM would be higher. At 4,102 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM (300 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1952 Ferrari 340 MM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
Model | HHR | 340 MM |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 4102 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |