2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1954 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1954 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1954 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | HHR | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2401 cc | 5114 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2600 mm |
