2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1954 Humber Super Snipe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,136 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1954 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1954 Humber Super Snipe.
Because 1954 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1954 Humber Super Snipe | |
Make | Chevrolet | Humber |
Model | HHR | Super Snipe |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 4136 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 68 L |