2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | HHR | Crestline |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 3643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2940 mm |