2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 30 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1955 Riley RM A | |
Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
Model | HHR | RM A |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 2201 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1236 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2870 mm |