2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1956 Morris Oxford
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1956 Morris Oxford. (52 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1956 Morris Oxford.
Because 1956 Morris Oxford is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Morris Oxford. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Morris Oxford. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1956 Morris Oxford | |
Make | Chevrolet | Morris |
Model | HHR | Oxford |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2470 mm |