2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 886 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | HHR | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2201 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |
