2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1962 Volvo P 1800

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1962 Volvo P 1800. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo P 1800.

Because 1962 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo P 1800. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo P 1800.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet HHR 1962 Volvo P 1800
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model HHR P 1800
Year Released 2009 1962
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1778 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 260 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 353 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 68 L