2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | HHR | Elite |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 29 L |