2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | HHR | Tiger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 27 L |