2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 2009 Chevrolet HHR and 1965 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,997 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | HHR | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |