2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1966 Subaru FF-1
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Subaru FF-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Subaru FF-1 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1966 Subaru FF-1. (47 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1966 Subaru FF-1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Subaru FF-1. (77 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Subaru FF-1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1966 Subaru FF-1 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
| Model | HHR | FF-1 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 77 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2430 mm |
