2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1966 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 TVR Griffith. (229 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1966 TVR Griffith.
Because 1966 TVR Griffith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 TVR Griffith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1966 TVR Griffith | |
| Make | Chevrolet | TVR |
| Model | HHR | Griffith |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 67 L |
