2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1972 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 2101.
Because 1972 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1972 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | HHR | 2101 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2430 mm |