2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (306 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (226 Nm). This means 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | HHR | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 5798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 226 Nm | 306 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2760 mm |