2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1982 Holden Camira
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1982 Holden Camira | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | HHR | Camira |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2580 mm |