2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | HHR | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |