2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1983 Audi 4000
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (168 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1983 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 4000.
Because 1983 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (222 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1983 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | HHR | 4000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 86.4 mm |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2550 mm |