2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (226 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i. 2009 Chevrolet HHR has automatic transmission and 1997 Rover 414i has manual transmission. 1997 Rover 414i will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet HHR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1997 Rover 414i | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
| Model | HHR | 414i |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2401 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2780 mm |
