2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1998 Ford Triton
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Triton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Triton would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (168 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1998 Ford Triton. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Triton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 238 kg more than 1998 Ford Triton. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (222 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Triton. (174 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Triton.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 1998 Ford Triton | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | HHR | Triton |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1232 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3520 mm |