2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2001 Daihatsu Naked
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2001 Daihatsu Naked. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 2001 Daihatsu Naked.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daihatsu Naked. (107 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 2001 Daihatsu Naked | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | HHR | Naked |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 107 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 37 L |