2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 322 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (280 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (203 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | HHR | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2201 cc | 2982 cc |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 944 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 87 L |