2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (168 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 952 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (222 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | HHR | E-350 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |