2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (168 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 40 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (222 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (217 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | HHR | Outlander |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 59 L |