2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (226 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | HHR | XL7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 250 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.3 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |