2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2008 Toyota Stallion
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Stallion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Stallion would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Toyota Stallion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Stallion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Stallion. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Stallion. 2009 Chevrolet HHR has automatic transmission and 2008 Toyota Stallion has manual transmission. 2008 Toyota Stallion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet HHR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 2008 Toyota Stallion | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | HHR | Stallion |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 1812 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 226 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |