2009 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet HHR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet HHR would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet HHR | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | HHR | C70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |