2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Impala | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |
