2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 35 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Impala | Munga |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 31 L |
