2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1964 Citroen Ak 350
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1964 Citroen Ak 350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Impala | Ak 350 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 22 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 63 L |