2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Impala | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2540 mm |