2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,899 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (233 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 439 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Impala | Munga |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3899 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 233 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 31 L |
