2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1966 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1966 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1966 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
| Model | Impala | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
