2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (233 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (213 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 36 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Impala | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3899 cc | 6550 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 233 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2960 mm |
