2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1969 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1969 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 899 kg more than 1969 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1969 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Impala | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |
