2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1971 Holden Torana
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Torana would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1971 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1971 Holden Torana.
Because 1971 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Holden Torana. (131 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1971 Holden Torana | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | Torana |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2440 mm |