2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1982 Daihatsu Charmant
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Charmant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Charmant would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Charmant. (82 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Charmant.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Charmant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Daihatsu Charmant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Charmant. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Charmant.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1982 Daihatsu Charmant | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | Impala | Charmant |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2410 mm |