2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (303 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 1291 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (438 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Impala | 323 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5670 cc | 1071 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 303 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 438 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2141 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2370 mm |
